"The dark side of musculoskeletal Care” : why do ineffective techniques seem to work? a comprehensive review of complementary and alternative therapies

dc.contributor.authorMamud Meroni, Lucas
dc.contributor.authorTarcaya, Germán E.
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco Uribarren, Andoni
dc.contributor.authorRossettini, Giacomo
dc.contributor.authorFlores Cortes, Mar
dc.contributor.authorCeballos Laita, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-17T21:45:36Z
dc.date.available2025-02-17T21:45:36Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe increasing interest in complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) for musculoskeletal care has sparked significant debate, particularly regarding their biological plausibility and clinical effectiveness. This comprehensive review critically examines the use of two of the most widely utilized CAMs—osteopathy and chiropractic care—over the past 25 years, focusing on their biological plausibility, clinical effectiveness, and potential mechanisms of action. Our analysis of current research and clinical studies reveals that osteopathy and chiropractic are based on concepts such as “somatic dysfunction” and “vertebral subluxation”, which lack robust empirical validation. While these therapies are often presented as credible treatment options, studies evaluating their effectiveness frequently exhibit serious methodological flaws, providing insufficient empirical support for their recommendation as first-line treatments for musculoskeletal conditions. The effects and mechanisms underlying osteopathy and chiropractic remain poorly understood. However, placebo responses—mediated by the interaction of contextual, psychological, and non-specific factors—appear to play a significant role in observed outcomes. The integration of therapies with limited biological plausibility, whose effects may primarily rely on placebo effects, into healthcare systems raises important ethical dilemmas. This review highlights the need for rigorous adherence to scientific principles and calls for a more comprehensive investigation into biobehavioral, contextual, and psychosocial factors that interact with the specific effects of these interventions. Such efforts are essential to advancing our understanding of CAMs, enhancing clinical decision-making, promoting ethical practices, and guiding future research aimed at improving patient care in musculoskeletal disorders.en
dc.description.filiationMamud Meroni, Lucas. Universidad de Flores; Argentina.
dc.description.filiationTarcaya, Germán E. Universidad de Flores; Argentina.
dc.description.filiationCarrasco Uribarren, Andoni. Universitat International de Catalunya; España.
dc.description.filiationRossettini, Giacomo. Universidad de Verona; Italia.
dc.description.filiationFlores Cortes, Mar. Universidad de Málaga; España.
dc.description.filiationCeballos Laita, Luis. Universidad de Valladolid; España.
dc.identifier.citationMamud meroni, L., Tarcaya, G. E., Carrasco Uribarren, A., Rossettini, G., Flores Cortes, M. y Ceballos Laita, L. (2025). "The dark side of musculoskeletal Care” : why do ineffective techniques seem to work? a comprehensive review of complementary and alternative therapies. A Comprehensive Review of Complementary and Alternative Therapies. Biomedicines, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020392es_AR
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/biomedicines13020392
dc.identifier.issn2227-9059
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14340/2061
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Suiza
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectSISTEMA MUSCULOESQUELETICOes_AR
dc.subjectTERAPIAS COMPLEMENTARIASes_AR
dc.subjectOSTEOPATIAes_AR
dc.subjectQUIROPRACTICAes_AR
dc.subjectEFECTO PLACEBOes_AR
dc.title"The dark side of musculoskeletal Care” : why do ineffective techniques seem to work? a comprehensive review of complementary and alternative therapiesen
dc.typeArtículoes_AR
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dspace.entity.typeArtículo

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Articulo_Mamud.pdf
Tamaño:
2.21 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.44 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones