Facultad de Ciencias Organizacionales y de la Empresa
URI permanente para esta comunidad
Examinar
Examinando Facultad de Ciencias Organizacionales y de la Empresa por Autor "Contreras-Barraza, Nicolás"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Artículo How to measure organic fruit consumer behavior : a systematic review(Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2022) Vega-Muñoz, Alejandro; Gil-Marín, Miseldra; Contreras-Barraza, Nicolás; Salazar-Sepúlveda, Guido; Losada, Analía VerónicaThis review article seeks to systematically identify appropriate ways to measure the consumption behavior of organic fruits. The systematic review of the literature was performed according to the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the eligibility criteria were declared through the PICOS (population, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study) tool based on 277 article records scientiometrically identified in both the Journal Citation Report databases from Web of Science. The literature review stages determined a reduced set of articles that presented valid and reliable measurement scales that covered determinant constructs in organic fruit consumer behavior (OFCB). The measurement scale with the best results reported within the screened articles covered the constructs related to health, fear, environment, effort, and economy, allowing it to serve as a reference instrument in further studies on food consumer behavior.Artículo Sustainability accounting studies : a metasynthesis(Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2022) Gil-Marín, Miseldra; Vega-Muñoz, Alejandro; Contreras-Barraza, Nicolás; Salazar-Sepúlveda, Guido; Vera-Ruiz, Sandra; Losada, Analía VerónicaThis review article seeks to discuss the sustainability accounting concept by examining previously conducted studies on this topic in order to understand its thematic progress in the academic literature. This study is a metasynthesis, where, in the identification phase, 334 documents published in the Web of Science (WoS) database are selected, and in the literature review stages, 15 re-reviews are selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. The results reveal that businesses, academia, and regulatory bodies do not recognize a homogeneous terminology when it comes to sustainability accounting. There is a variety of synonyms that complicate the disclosure of activities carried out by companies in the pursuit of the sustainability development goals (SDGs), with SDGs 5, 6, 13, 14, and 15 being analyzed in the academic literature in relation to the sustainability accounting concept. For future research directions, the review articles analyzed suggest examining the concrete effects produced by practices related to sustainability performance in companies, linking the relevance of understanding the sustainability reports related to the sustainability performance of companies.